Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Twitter: Too much info
After reading an article on fastcompany.com on Monday, April 20, 2009 about people and their twitter accounts, I am still laughing. I always knew there were a lot of dumb people in the world but seriously. I think twitter is a great social media outlet and I think it is cool to let people know what you are doing throughout the day, but limit what the general public can see. Who in his right mind would go on a website that his boss just caught him on, and post a remark about him on the same day? Do you not think that he will log on and check on your status again? Duh! The reality is that the majority of the business world is familiarizing themselves with social media and it has proven to be a useful tool in business; therefore, it should be used with business manners. It is not necessary to put all of your personal business out in the open. Is it really worth losing your job over. The answer is simple, when you twitter at work, keep it clean!
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Can Newspapers Be Saved?
Cliff Kuang published an article on fastcompany.com on April 15, 2009 pertaining to the question of whether or not newspapers can be saved by simply redesigning the layout. Past studies have illustrated success of a circulation increase from a Great Britain paper who recently changed its design aspect. Many people tend to think magazines will far outlast newspapers because it is appealing, something you can hold in your hand and relate to. So it should make sense for newspapers to follow magazine format, right? The downfall of the idea of a layout change comes down to cost issues. A layout change for the newspapers would be very expensive. Not to mention the increase of costs in color printing on every page, but is the expense not worth it. If the changes are not made, what price is going to be paid? Will we lose newspapers forever? Can a price really be put on such a staple in American History? Well some suggestions I can think of would be to move the entire source of paper to electronic versions. This way, printing would not even be a factor. If the buyer wants to print a hard copy, it would be his/her cost, not the papers. Also, if newspapers are not fully ready to let go of the printing of newspapers, they could have the staff on hand, or hire interns to redesign the papers. This would dramatically cut down on the costs of the papers. I personally think redesigning the paper is worth a shot, what does the industry have to lose? There is only room for improvement, so go for it!
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Trend Alert... Plastic is the New Black!
What's next? I recently read an article on fastcompany.com entitled "Armani Meets Dasani." I think my mouth is still wide open. What in the world will people come up with next. I am all for saving the environment and recycling and researching new energy-efficient methods to apply in our daily lives, but a plastic suit? Until I read this article I wasn't even aware there was a suit for men that was made of recycled PET bottles! I cannot imagine that it is a popular selling item. Plastic bottles? A suit from plastic bottles? Lol!!! I consider myself to be a very trendy woman, but I am not certain that I can say I would ever purchase a clothing item made from plastic bottles. Accessories, maybe, but not clothing. I am in agreement with the author of the article, Ariel Schwartz; although this may be recycling, how is the elaborate process cutting down on energy emissions? Bettering the environment does not consist of fixing one problem but contributing to another in the process. I think Debenham's needs to go back to the drawing board on this one. I appreciate the effort and it was a nice thought, but I am definitely not a fan of this idea and don't think I can be convinced otherwise.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
The Cost of Stylish Yoga...
After reading Luluemon's Cult of Selling in Fast Company's April 2009 issue, I learned of a brand of clothing specifically targeted to yoga participants. I have never taken a yoga class, but I am an avid gym goer. Having never heard of this brand, I am intrigued by its supporters. The owner of this company has not just made a label of clothing, but a whole society, out of a tank top. It starts with purchasing clothes and ends in taking seminars to better your life. I definitely see the emergence of a cult via this brand, but who's to say its a bad thing? At least the goal of the company is to better the life of its followers. No harm is being done by luring people into a lifestyle that makes them feel good about themselves, as long as the company stays honest about its intentions.
I don't know that I agree with the company's intentions of branching out to swimwear and running wear. I think the company found its niche with yoga wear and it is sending the message that they are more interested in adding profits than to staying loyal to its yoga market. This aspect has the possibility to turn some of its followers off and shedding a negative light on the company. My advice, stick with what you know.
I don't know that I agree with the company's intentions of branching out to swimwear and running wear. I think the company found its niche with yoga wear and it is sending the message that they are more interested in adding profits than to staying loyal to its yoga market. This aspect has the possibility to turn some of its followers off and shedding a negative light on the company. My advice, stick with what you know.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Where Does the Buck Stop?
Dan and Chip Heath composed an article entitled Why Customers Will Pay You to Restrain Them on Wed Mar 18, 2009. I found this article rather interesting on a couple of notes. I myself LOVE to spend money on wants and needs, but more so on wants. On one hand, I feel offering a service to lead people in living the life they desire is a great thing. If someone wants to lose weight, sure it would be easier to have restaurants deny them certain foods. But what are we teaching people? One problem in today's society is that things are too easy on some people. So if we start charging people to help them keep from doing certain things in their lives, we are sending the message of "if you have money, then you can be worry free." But in making life easier on some people, we are making life harder for those that are going to have to cater to them. So where does it end? When are we going to take responsibility and develop will power? Our society needs to learn things are not always easy and hard work eventually (and hopefully) will pay off.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Just 1 More Version Please!
I read an article on fastcompany.com written by Kit Eaton on Thu Mar 19, 2009 pertaining to and upgrade of Internet Explorer.
It seems that every time I get onto the Internet there is some new version of some program available! When is enough, enough? I think it is good to make improvements and software, I just think the creators take it and run! Not to mention that every time a new version of software is introduced I have to stop and take the time to find a compatibility package just to view a document or a window of the Internet. In my opinion, these are just ways to cause consumers, who honestly pay for the packages of software we use, to have to come out of pocket every month and its ridiculous! I always vow to abstain from buying new programs or uploading newer versions of software but in the end I am somewhat forced to do so in order to keep communication up. Leave it alone already!! Once every few years is ample for updates!!
It seems that every time I get onto the Internet there is some new version of some program available! When is enough, enough? I think it is good to make improvements and software, I just think the creators take it and run! Not to mention that every time a new version of software is introduced I have to stop and take the time to find a compatibility package just to view a document or a window of the Internet. In my opinion, these are just ways to cause consumers, who honestly pay for the packages of software we use, to have to come out of pocket every month and its ridiculous! I always vow to abstain from buying new programs or uploading newer versions of software but in the end I am somewhat forced to do so in order to keep communication up. Leave it alone already!! Once every few years is ample for updates!!
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Are Incentives Really A Good Thing?
Incentives, in my opinion, cloud the goal in today's business world. Although they are meant to drive business upward and motivate employees to work harder to reach a set goal incentives cause people to cut corners and in turn cause less efficient work to be produced. The business world, much like the everyday world, has become greedy and money focused. Yes, I agree making money is key but no at the expense of quality work and customer satisfaction. When you are employed by a company that is your team and you all should be working towards a similar goal, not under handing one another in order to get your promised "bonus". I am not saying incentives never work but they should not be what causes employees to come to work everyday. Incentives, to me, are rewards for quality work and are not supposed to be the focus of your job. Businesses should reevaluate the entire system of incentives and look for alternatives so they are not the main focus of the company and the people who work for them. One possible way to achieve the desired result is to offer incentives only after the target has been met. Surprise your employees and reward them for their good work only after you have seen the finished product. This will cause them to focus on performing well and can make for better, more efficient business.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)